Here are some of your comments and our correspondence |
||
Back to main page | ||
Keith A. Barry's letter to Kamloops' Mayor Terry Lake on May 3, 2006 Dear Mayor: I am contacting you on an issue I am sure that you are aware of regarding the lack of CBC TV broad casts in the Kamloops area. I would like to know why the Mayor and city council have not taken exception to this issue and have not voiced concerns publicly to the federal government about not receiving a service paid for through our federal taxes. It seem the rest of the province including Kelowna,Vernon and Pentiction receive this service but not here in Kamloops, Why is this?, and I have heard not a peep out of any of our elected city officials. Once again the people of Kamloops are being treated as second class citizens (e.G., highway tolls,) and not receiving a service they have paid for. I want our Mayor and city council to use their influence to restore CBC- TV broadcasts to Kamloops. your truly Keith A. Barry Mayor Terry Lake responds on May 6 to Keith Barry's letter Dear Mr. Barry
|
||
On May 14, Kamloops' councilor Arjun Singh wrote Keith Barry Hello Keith, Councilor John O ' Fee moved that we write a letter expressing our concern about of the diminishment of CBC service in Kamloops. And this was unanimously supported. very best Arjun very best regards, Arjun Singh |
||
Back to main page | ||
MP Betty Hinton responded to SOCK president Pam
Astbury on May 16, 2006 Hello Pam
Betty Hinton's letter to Bev Oda, Minister of Canadian Heritage Betty Hinton's
letter to Diane Rhéaume,
Secretary General, Betty Hinton's
letter to Mr. Robert
Rabinovitch,President and Chief Executive Officer, |
||
Doug to responded to the article by
Mike Youds on June 2. As for SOCK - we've connected with hundreds of people and have ignited great debates around lunch rooms, coffee shops, and dinner tables. I am truly excited about the level of support that we've received from Kamloopsians and encourage all citizens to visit the web site and share their thoughts and feelings with each other. People are standing up for their right to be connected on issues of national and international importance as well as to entertainment of a intellectual and sophisticated nature. Kamloops is an community that supports a University and a huge arts movement, I'm not surprised that we aren't accepting this situation. This issue of the role of the CBC in Canadian society concerns not just Kamloopsians but all Canadians and has touched not only our City Hall and MP's office but the National Senate as well." Let me know if there is anything that I can elaborate on. I also have a great CBC t-shirt that I could pose for a photo in :) |
||
On Friday, 9 Jun 2006, Douglas wrote I just read the article in the Kamloops Daily News Extra regarding your views on the now unavailable CBC TV coverage. I agree with you 100% ! I am a senior citizen and no way can I afford to connect to cable or satellite TV in order to receive CBC programming. I have sent an email to CBC and received a reply basically saying... sorry but we cannot afford to set up a satellite station in the Kamloops area. I was extremely disappointed in their obvious lack of concern. They seem to think that every senior citizen has a money well in their back yard. As a federal tax payer for many, many years I feel it is my right to have access to CBC programming since I and thousands of others have financed their operation since their inception. I feel left out in the cold and completely ignored. I must admit that at this point in time I am not particularly proud to be a Canadian! I look forward to hearing from you and would like to assist you in any way I can. |
Back to main page | |
On June 7, Michael Crawford responds to SOCK
president Pam Astbury Hi Pam;
|
||
On June 14 John Woods wrote SOCK president Pam Astbury To Pam Astbury ..... Don't cry Pam , loosing the CBC in Kamloops is just another step "forward" in loosing it across Canada ! .... The CBC has been a drain on Canadian tax payers since it's birth in the 50's .... If it wasn't for the fact that we are forced to pay for it's existence, it would have fallen on it's face years ago ! ... Between the corn-ball comedy, and the dry and uninteresting programs, the only thing that keeps it afloat is " Hockey Night In Canada" ( and it's getting boring too ) ... If, you doubt this , spend a little time in a local coffee shop, and ask everybody in there ---- what did you watch on your TV last night ? ... The bottom line is ,,,,, If the CBC was any good, it could stand on it's own feet ..... Oh, and by the way ,, CBC radio isn't any better for the same reasons ! ..... J. Woods .. Logan Lake B.C. |
||
On Monday,
July 10,Frank Rhebergen wrote I
wrote letters to the CRTC, CBC and Betty Hinton and I was very unsatisfied
with the responses received. I was reluctantly letting go of the issue
because there's only so much time and energy one can put into these sorts of
things. I was happy to read that an organized group is carrying on the
effort in Kamloops. I'd like to pass on to you a copy of a letter we sent as
it presents another perspective that I haven't seen much of in the local
media so far. Feel free to use it in your group's efforts to achieve justice
in this matter. Thanks for the good work! |
||
Back to main page | ||
On July 18, 2006, MP
Betty Hinton wrote Hugh Jordan Dear Mr. Jordan, Thank you for your recent correspondence concerning CBC Television reception in your area. I can assure you that I am very aware, active, and have raised the issue of CBC television directly with the Minister of Heritage, the CRTC and CBC Radio Canada’s President, Mr. Rabinovitch. As you know, for decades, a limited amount of the CBC Television program schedule (approximately 40-50 hours per week) was transmitted to the Kamloops area by local station CFJC-TV, under an Affiliation Agreement with the station’s owner Jim Pattison Broadcast Group (JPBG). In the summer of 2005, JPBG decided that to protect the viability of the station it would be necessary to end this agreement it applied to the CRTC for permission to disaffiliate, and the application was approved. On November 1, 2005, the CRTC issues Public Notice. Advertisements were place in area newspapers inviting comments on the application. For the majority of the residents of Kamloops, JPBG’s disaffiliation means they will actually receive more CBC programming than they ever had before. The approximately 95% of viewers who already subscribe to cable or satellite will now receive full CBC service. Prior to disaffiliation, cable was required to carry only the affiliate station. Now, with disaffiliation, cable is required to carry full CBC service on channel 13. Unfortunately, the remaining 5 percent of Kamloops residents who continue to receive their television signals over the air no longer have access to CBC programming. Constructing and maintaining new transmission assets to provide over the air signals is very expensive. Given the small and shrinking number of people who get their signals exclusively over the air, and the Corporation’s shrinking resources, they believe that constructing a new transmission system is an inefficient allocation of resources. The transcripts of this decision are public record and can be viewed on the Commission’s Web site at www.crtc.gc.ca . Section 20 of the Broadcasting Decision CRTC 2006-25 states that the commission reminds the CBC of its obligations under section 3(1)(m)(vii) of the Act to ensure that it’s programming “be made available throughout Canada by the most appropriate and efficient means as as resources become available for the purpose.” At the time of the CBC’s next license renewals, the Commission will review with the CBC its plans and the projected costs for extending its full service throughout Canada. I regret that at this time, there is not a more favorable conclusion for a small sector of this riding and I look forward to the next CRTC review. Sincerely, Betty Hinton, MP Kamloops – Thompson – Cariboo |
||
Back to main page | ||
On July 25, SOCK
president Pam Astbury sent this email to CBC's Marketplace
Hello Marketplace! On August 25 CBC's Marketplace responded to Pam Hello,
|
||
On September 13 Gisela Ruckert
wrote Pam Astbury
|
||
Ocrober | ||
On October 11, Pam Astbury wrote Ken Benham of
the Council of Canadians
Hello Ken,
Read Letter to the Prince George
Citizen |
Back to main page | |
On November 1, 2006 Pam Astbury sent this email to Betty Hinton, MP
Hello Ms Hinton, |
||
Back to main page | ||
On November 16, Karen Wirsig from the Canadian
Media Guild emailed us Hi - I work
with the Canadian Media Guild, which represents CBC employees |
||
On November 20 Gisela Ruckert wrote the CBC again Thank you for your response to my letter expressing dissatisfaction with the decision of the CBC to make CBC television unavailable to Kamloops viewers who are not cable subscribers. Perhaps my questions were not stated clearly enough, since your letter writer (Mr. Denis Andrychuk) did not answer them. I will restate them for you in simpler terms. |
||
On December 1, 2006, Betty Hinton emailed Pam
Astbury [to view article referred to in Kamloops this Week, go to "In
the News" link on home page]
Dear Ms. Astbury: |
||
On December 1, 2006, Pam Astbury replied to Betty Hinton
Ms. Hinton |
Back to main page | |
On December 21, Pam Astbury sent a letter from SOCK to the CEO of CBC,
Mr. Rabinovitch, recommending that Kamloops become a test site for digital
transmission of over-the-air TV. The suggested name of the project is
Kamloops: Pilot City.
Read letter in Word document |
||
On December 21, Karen Wirsig of the Canadian Media Guild responded to
SOCK's project of Kamloops: Pilot City Hi Pam - great initiative! I am attaching here our follow-up submission to the CRTC. In there, we recommend that the CRTC examine the possibility of "multi-plexing" in smaller cities and rural areas. That would require a digital transmitter, which can transmit at standard definition up to 5 stations using a single frequency. We suggest that the CBC, along with provincial or non-profit broadcasters could use the transmitter together as a hub. It would be free, over-the-air. The hitch is that people would have to buy new receivers and/or TVs to receive the digital signal over the air. That is what people in the US are currently doing, so the equipment is available. More grist for the mill! Happy holidays ... and good luck for the new year! Karen Read the supplementary submission to the CRTC from the Canadian Media Guild in pdf
|
||