November 6, 2013
Terminally-ill Canadians have
given a lot of thought to the kind of treatment they want at the end of their
lives. I wonder what Hassan Rasouli thinks? More to the point, does Mr. Rasouli
think?
Even after three years of being hooked up to life support and in a nearly
vegetative state, Rasouli's daughter and wife are convinced that he does think.
His doctors have a different view. They say that Rasouli's family are mistaking
reflexive actions for mental awareness. Such patients engage in activities such
as opening and moving eyes, crying, smiling, frowning, grunting, yawning,
chewing, swallowing, and moving limbs - - all which produce the illusion of
conscious acts.
His case is hopeless and unethical as far as his doctors are concerned. They
swear an oath to do no harm but the surgical and technical interventions
performed on Mr. Rasouli amount to torture; keeping him alive biologically but
in a state of living death.
Rasouli's doctors were so convinced of their case that they took it to the
Supreme Court of Canada. Last month the court ruled that doctors can't
unilaterally remove a patient from life support without the family's consent.
The ruling is specific to Ontario which is the only province with a board to
review such disagreements.
Chief Justice McLachlin spoke for the majority of justices: “Over the past 17
years, the Board has developed a strong track record in handling precisely the
issue raised in this case.”
|
A minority of justices disagreed. “Such an
extension of patient autonomy to permit a patient to insist on the
continuation of treatment that is medically futile would have a detrimental
impact on the standard of care and legal, ethical, and professional duties
in the practice of medicine.” And these patients tie up a ICU bed worth
about $1 million a year.
The illusion of life is persuasive with modern health care. Dr. Anand Kumar,
a physician with experience in end-of-life treatment has a frank assessment.
“I can take a guy’s heart out and keep it beating on a stick. And if you put
a gun to my head, I could even take a person who has been dead for 20
minutes and reanimate him. But when people say that they want everything to
be done, at some point you have to say: Literally, everything? Or, do you
mean, everything reasonable?”
What would Hassan Rasouli have wanted? We can only guess since he didn't
give any directions as to medical intervention. As a retired engineer, I
would think that Rasouli's rational choice would not to be kept artificially
alive. But his family's wishes are clear: they want God to decide. But God
has left the room and left Mr. Rasouli suspended by the too-clever devices
of man.
In B.C., we don't have to leave the vagaries up to poorly written "living
wills" or well-meaning family members. The Ministry of Health in cooperation
with Interior Health and others have come up with a clearly written
directive that specifies end-of-life care called My Voice -- Expressing My
Wishes for Future Health Care Treatment.
I plan to fill mine out mine soon.
David Charbonneau is the owner of Thompson Studio
He can be reached at
dcharbonneau13@shaw.ca
|