Eye View 

by David Charbonneau


Support for CBC is not a subsidy

December 1, 2011

Kamloops city council sensibly voted in favour of the new CBC radio station. What followed the vote was bewildering.

Approval of the proposed station is a no-brainer. Kamloops will become the centre of a broadcast region that stretches all the way from the Suswap Lakes, east to Lytton, and north to 100 Mile House. We will finally be recognized as a cultural and business centre similar to the way that CBC helped root Kelowna as the hub of the Okanagan.

The old arrangement made Kamloops a satellite of Kelowna. Reporting of news from Kamloops was done out of Kelowna. Or, more often, Kamloops was not covered at all because CBC Kelowna lacks the resources.

We may be well connected in terms of being the hub of major railways and highways but we are not connected to any major media networks. Kamloops has a thriving arts, education, and business community but we are virtually in a black hole when it comes to national recognition. With CBC radio, at last news that originates in Kamloops will immediately be available to the nation.

That wasn`t the case in 2003 when wildfires raced through Kamloops, chasing me from my home in Westsyde. As far as the rest of Canada was concerned, the wildfires were happing somewhere in the Okanagan because that’s where the news was coming from.

Approval by city council of the new CBC station was predictable. What followed wasn`t. After a stirring presentation to city council by former Socred MLA Bud Smith, the discussion when awry. Smith made a passionate pitch for councilors to call for the removal of what he called a “subsidy” for the CBC and have the money directed to infrastructure.

 

The CBC receives an operating budget but it can hardly be called a subsidy. If tax dollars directed towards the CBC are a subsidy, then so are tax dollars directed towards highway maintenance, schools, and garbage collection. But no reasonable person would claim that roads are subsidized through tax dollars, even those who don’t own a car. Even those who don’t have school age children would not claim that they subsidize schools through tax dollars. And funding for garbage collection is a necessity, not a subsidy. It’s all part of the cost of running a city, province, or country through taxes.

The fuzzy logic seemed to be contagious. One councilor was so inspired by Smith’s speech that she called CBC “an elite group that doesn’t raise money to pay their salaries.” Unlike entrepreneurial city councilors, I assume, who don`t receive a ``subsidy`` from taxpayers but regularly raise money to pay their salaries.

Until reporters pointed it out latter, councilors didn't seem to notice that Smith`s business would be the beneficiary of redirected infrastructure funds.

The merit of the CBC is an interesting topic but, quite frankly, none of city hall’s business any more than garbage collection is a federal matter.

I agree with Canada’s Conservative Prime Minister, R.B. Bennett, who started the CBC in 1932. Bennett saw the CBC as a unifying force that helped forge and connect our vast nation.

If anything, the CBC is underfunded. Canada spends relatively little on public broadcasting compared to other industrial nations. Canada is twentieth of twenty-six countries in the OECD when it comes to spending on public broadcasting.

The CBC has its faults. Not only does Kamloops deserve a radio station, we should also receive CBC TV at no extra cost, without paying for cable of satellite, as most cities our size do.

But the CBC should be applauded for finally doing the right thing in Kamloops.
 


David Charbonneau is the owner of Trio Technical.
He can be reached at dcharbonneau13@shaw.ca

 





go back to my Columns in the