Eye View
by David Charbonneau
Time to move to Plan Bee
February 18, 2010
|
Honeybees naturally have a
varied diet, so when they are fed nothing
but one type of pollen in a thousand acre mono-crop, they become
stressed from malnourishment and prone to disease. Some cash crops
are especially low in nutrition; blueberries and sunflowers have low
-protein pollens. But with nothing but junk food as far as the eye
can see, what’s a bee to do? Wildflowers used to provide some variety
but they have been removed along with all neighbouring “weeds.” Another threat is pesticides. One synthetic form of nicotine is soaked up by the plant’s leaves, stems and roots. This pesticide is a deadly neurotoxin to bugs and linked to mass killing of bees. One brand, Imidacloprid, is approved for use on 140 crops in more than 100 countries, a bonanza for the German chemical giant Bayer according to New Internationalist magazine. Now Sam Comfort has given up his nomadic life and settled down with his bees. His research has found that inbreeding has reduced the genetic diversity of commercial honeybees. In an attempt to breed the best pollinators, bee breeders have removed the genetic variations that could help the strongest bees survive. Comfort discovered that commercial bees have only 2 per cent of the genes from the original European stock whereas wild honeybees from feral colonies have 30 per cent. No surprise you consider that breeders use only 500 select mothers to produce a million queen bees which are shipped all over the continent. Feral bees are more disease resistant and vigorous. They spend more time foraging and building honey supplies. Like genetic diversity in any species, the feral bees represent a gene pool from which commercial honeybees could benefit. The industrialization of our food supply has produced mountains of cheap food with minimal labour but as in the stock market, high returns yield greater risk. The cost of cheap food has been the loss of bio-diversity and that makes us less resilient. Writer and activist Chip Ward argues that we reduce the resilience of natural systems at our peril: “How futile it is in the long run to impose narrow notions of efficiency on natural systems that are profoundly dynamic and inherently unpredictable.”
|