June 24, 2010
What enemy threatens Canada to the extent that we
need to spend $1 billion on security at the G8/20 summits? For that amount of
money we could fund a whole year of our war in Afghanistan.
As Pogo famously noted, it turns out that the enemy is us. Government agents
have been following citizens as they go about their daily lives; citizens whose
greatest threat is belief in social justice and concern about the environment.
Agents have been spying on them on the streets, knocking at their doors at home,
scrutinizing meetings they attend, and harassing them at work.
Spy agency spokeswoman Isabelle Scott thinks it's necessary. "CSIS is
continuously assessing the potential for violence resulting from the activities
of certain groups."
However, if past summits are any indicator it's the police we have to worry
about. At 2007 at the North American Leaders Summit in Montebello, Quebec,
protestors were so peaceful that undercover police officers wearing bandana
masks had to incite demonstrators to throw rocks.
What was it that worried police in Montebello so? Was it the sight of Maude
Barlow, Chairperson of the Council of Canadians, wheeling boxes petitions down
the street? Was it the Raging Grannies in their bright dresses and flowery hats,
driving a battered old Lincoln Continental?
No, what summit organizers fear most is being out-maneuvered as they were in
1999 at the World Trade Organization in Seattle. More than 40,000 protesters
converged on the city with the intention of "shutting down the WTO" and they
did. Demonstrators organized activities using cell phones and laptops. Teams of
peaceful protestors formed human blockades at strategic locations, snarling
traffic and eventually trapping trade delegates in hotels.
Summit organizers are not going to be caught by surprise again. Since Seattle,
defence against citizens has become more complex in what they call "Military
Operations on Urban Terrain."
Police now understand the optics. They want to avoid TV coverage in which
robot-like riot squads beat helpless protestors with clubs. That explains the
clandestine intimidation of potential demonstrators in advance. To avoid ugly
clashes organizers have tried to corral protesters in containment pens,
so-called "free speech zones." Other dirty tricks include the denial of march
permits, mass detentions, harassment of legal observers, confinement of
independent media, surveillance by CSIS, raids on lodgings and meeting places -
- all out of the glare of TV lights. It's all part of getting a strategic
advantage before the summit.
|
Once the summit begins, infiltration of groups by agent provocateurs to stir
up agitation helps discredit the legitimate concerns of protesters. A small
number of criminals aid in the mayhem. They provide a convenient brush to
tar all protestors.
Weapons are evolving away from rubber bullets and tear gas to more exotic
tools. Police will use those in Toronto as last resort. Instead, researchers
are investigating weapons that modify behaviour without trauma.
The goal of these new weapons is to produce lethargy and disorientation.
Police in Toronto are deploying the LRAD-X100 sound-cannons that produce
dizziness and nausea. These methods are a preferred alternative to the
discredited Taser as a "pain compliance" device. Police don't want to face
the scrutiny that resulted after the infamous death of Robert Dziekanski at
Vancouver's airport.
Chemical pacifiers for crowd-control have investigated for years. The hope
is that "tactical pharmacology" will quell the restless masses in the
streets stirred by capitalist meltdowns, imperialist wars, and environmental
collapse. Penn State's Institute for Non-Lethal Defense Technology is
looking into some promising candidates like Valium, Prozac, and opiate
derivatives that can be delivered to the masses. The irony is not lost on
investigative reporter Ando Arike who writes in Harper's Magazine: "It may
seem absurd that the eternal battle between the haves and have-nots devolve
into a Marxist pun."
Protestors have legitimate complaints that governments would like to ignore
by treating them as crazed demonstrators. That misrepresentation becomes
more difficult to sustain as the corrupt business of arms manufacturers,
dirty oil, and Wall Street bandits become more apparent.
I like the pharmacological solution for diffusing tension. The Raging
Grannies should hand out hash brownies to everyone; protestors and guards
alike. The police could then hand over riot gear for protestors to wear and
the protestors could give rally signs to police and everyone would have a
good laugh. Humour is the most disarming device of all.
David Charbonneau is the owner of Trio Technical.
He can be reached at dcharbonneau13@shaw.ca
|