Eye View
by David Charbonneau
Workers involved in labour disputes deserve public's support
October 4, 2005 Kamloops Daily News Unions benefit all workers. When strikes occur, there isn't the amount of support that striking workers deserve. The wages of all workers are greater because of unions, regardless of whether they belong or not. B.C. is good example. We have a large union sector and we have the highest hourly wages in Canada. Unions set wage standards that nonunion employers follow, according to a study from the Economic Policy Institute in the U.S. The degree of conformity depends on the employment sector and the qualifications of employees. It doesn't take much unionization to make a difference. For example, a worker with a high school diploma, whose workplace is not unionized but whose industry is 25% unionized, is paid 5% more than similar workers in less unionized industries says the study. Unions benefit society. They reduce inequality because they raise wages for low and middle-wage workers relative to higher-wage workers. Unions helped shape the modern work world with innovations such as the weekend, paid vacation, and safe working conditions. They brought an end to the 80-hour work week and child labour. Despite the good work of unions, support for them is often low especially during a strike. That's when striking workers need support because public opinion makes a difference in ending a strike. Yet, that support is not always offered - - the issues are poorly understood, consumers are inconvenienced, strikers are perceived as asking for too much. What's less obvious is that both sides are not equal at the bargaining table. The employer holds all the cards. Nothing is given without a struggle. Labour is the only thing that workers have to offer, and removal of that labour is the only bargaining chip they have. Striking workers are the visible part of the failure of negotiations. The employers are seldom seen. Employers are rarely accused of asking for too much, or for having too much power, or inconveniencing the public even though they are equally to blame. When the striking workers are forced onto the picket line, sympathies become precarious. Either the public strongly supports the strikers, as when nurses go on strike or are deeply divided, as when teachers go on strike. Nurses provide an obvious vital, personal, service. However, the work of teachers is largely unseen by parents. When out of sight, it is often out of mind. Teacher's work is often unappreciated in the face of difficult conditions. Also, public education is under attack from right-wing groups such as the Fraser Institute who would like to see more private schools. The problem is complicated by a drop in wages in nonunion jobs. In the last few decades, wages in the private sector have been falling relative to inflation. Workers in this predicament see the other side of the coin. They perceive that unions have not provided any benefit for them. To add insult to injury, nonunion workers see that unionized public sector workers are paid more than they are and that those wages come from the very taxes collected from low-wage earners. This creates a tension that can be politically exploited by governments. The B.C. Liberals did a good job in the 2001 campaign of promoting unions as the problem, rather than low wages. The Liberal managed to promote the flawed reasoning that wages are low because union wages are high, as if bringing down unionized wages would raise others. It's hard for teachers to get a good deal from this government when they are clearly regard teachers as the political enemies, as indicated by comments from local Liberal MLAs. Once the teacher's employers know the bias of the government, they can contemptuously bargain in bad faith knowing that the government will quickly order teachers back to work. This will essentially nullify any bargaining power teachers have. The B.C. government would like to claim that teachers are an essential service. Under other circumstances, that claim might be flattering to teachers but the government doesn't mean it to be. Can we really believe that the government regards teachers as indispensable when they won't seriously address their concerns? However, the real battle between employer and employee takes place in the court of public opinion. It is there that the public support of striking workers has an impact. Although union workers are the primary beneficiaries of organized labour, all of society benefits. Striking workers deserve our support.go back to my Columns in the