Eye View
by David Charbonneau
What Harper really needs is for Liberals to win non-confidence vote
May 17, 2005 , 2005 Kamloops Daily News As British Columbians go to the polls today, Conservative leader Stephen Harper is scheming to bring down the federal government and send us to the polls again this summer. It's a dumb idea. Canadians, especially British Columbians, don't want another vote. They want this federal government to work. Conservatives say that this is normal - - voters don't like voting but will do their democratic duty when required. This argument misses the point. It's not just that we are tired of voting, or that it's inconvenient. We don't want to go the polls again because we want this minority government to work. Voters sent a clear message one year ago: we want none of your parties to hold majority power and we want you guys to stop your childish bickering and cooperate for the good of all Canadians. For a while, all parties did get along but now the Conservatives and Bloc Quebecois think they can take advantage of a weakened government. If they listen to the voice of all Canadians, not just their narrow constituencies, they will get back to work. Other than more revelations from the Gomery inquiry of what we already suspected, nothing calls for another election. Conservative fortunes will not improve as a result of another election. Harper's image has not changed, if anything it's worse. He seems like a grim, opportunistic leader who will do anything to grab power. Harper also ignores the moderate members of his own party. Celebrity Conservative Belinda Stronach suggests that it would be better to wait until the budget is passed before bringing down the Liberals. But her advice has been ignored as it was when she supported same-sex marriage. Ms Stronach was considered a political lightweight when elected a year ago. Now she demonstrates a savvy that would move the Conservatives to the middle of the political spectrum where Canadians would take them seriously. [Later on the day this column was published, Ms. Stronach quit the Conservatives and switched to the Liberals, increasing the likelihood that the budget would be passed on Thursday.] In two days, Prime Minister Martin will introduce his budget to parliament and if it doesn't survive a vote, he will dissolve government. As much as Harper would like to bring down this government, "put it out of its misery" as he puts it, defeating the budget would be a tactical mistake. At the same time that he defeats the government he also defeats the budget, leaving many critical projects unfunded and undone. Harper tells us not to worry, that he would reintroduce the federal budget. What he doesn't say is that the budget his government would reintroduce is not the budget that he would defeat. That's because the budget has gone significant revisions since he stopped cooperating. A Harper influenced budget included things he wanted such as $4.5 million tax-cuts for corporations. Now those tax-cuts to big business are gone and the revised budget is more to NDP liking. It addresses social needs of Canadians such as child care, urban infrastructure, environmental protection, and labour training. Anyway, corporations don't need more tax cuts. They are awash with cash. But instead of investing in Canada, soaring profits are being shipped outside the country in record amounts, stashed in offshore tax shelters, or paid out to corporate insiders and shareholders. Andrew Jackson, economist for the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, says that "reputable sources rank Canada very highly in terms of both tax competitiveness and overall cost competitiveness." What Canadians need is an investment in working families and in education that will fuel our knowledge based economy. The revised budget will work towards those goals and still achieve a balanced budget. Harper is caught between a rock and hard place of his own resolve. If Harper defeats the budget, he will be seen as putting the interests of fat corporations ahead of common Canadians. If he doesn't defeat the government as soon as possible, he will be seen as dithering - - something he accuses the prime minister of doing. At the polls, the Liberals will pay for the sponsorship scandal. But the votes will go to the Bloc and the NDP, not the Conservatives. The Conservatives might get the most seats in parliament but it will be another minority government. Who will they form an alliance with? The Bloc? The best thing that could happen to Harper would be for the government to survive a non-confidence motion and continue with the business of the nation.go back to my Columns in the