Eye View
by David Charbonneau
World would be better off with higher gas prices
May 11, 2004 Kamloops Daily News Drivers got a glimpse of the future as gasoline prices recently climbed to 93 cents nationally - - and they didn't like what they saw. They are not ready for a world with no oil or gas. No wonder. World leaders, private and public, have failed to prepare consumers for that day. Leaders of the automotive industry have failed to mass produce fuel-efficient vehicles. The leader of the world's superpower tells us not to worry, that there is always another oil-rich country to invade. Consumers grasp the economics of supply and demand. They willingly pay more for bottled water, for example, because they know that drinkable water is becoming scarce. Yet consumers seem willfully blind to the economics of running out of oil. Their explanations are elusive: "not in my lifetime," "they'll find a cheap alternative soon." The future has more rude surprises in store, says Professor William Rees of the University of British Columbia. Today's prices aren't too high, they are too low. The true cost of gasoline is being hidden from us. In Canada and the U.S., drivers are sheltered from the actual cost of gasoline in a number of ways. One is government subsidies for exploration. Governments also give tax breaks oil companies as if they were just starting up. The oil industry is mature and doesn't require tax breaks. If oil companies are getting tax breaks, then you and I are making up the shortfall. Tax breaks should be given to small businesses, funding for alternative fuel research, and to low-income Canadians to help shelter them from the true cost of gasoline. Artificially low gas prices benefit those who consume the most fuel. If you drive an fuel-efficient car, you are subsidizing the driver of a gas-guzzler. Tax collected on the sale of gasoline partially compensates subsidies given to big oil companies but there are still other costs not included. Add the social cost to our health care system of breathing the pollution from burning of fossil fuels and from motor vehicle accidents. Add the cost of building more roads. Then the true cost is in the range of $2.20 to $5.95 per liter, says Rees in his article for the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives. Add the costs of maintaining an abundant North American supply of oil. North America is running out of oil, but prices don't reflect that. Oil extraction peaked in the U.S. in 1970, and in all North America in 1984. The world is running out of oil. The rich North Sea fields off Britain's shore peaked in 2000. Many studies indicate that by 2010, world oil production will have peaked. By 2020, there will be a 20 per cent shortfall. That shortfall has to be made up from "unidentified unconventional sources" says the International Energy Agency. Translation: we don't what will replace oil or where it will come from. With North America on the downhill side of production, the prices should be much higher. The reason they are not is because the U.S. uses it's military might to secure oil reserves elsewhere. The cost of the invasion of Iraq is currently $1 billion U.S. dollars a day. If military costs were included, the true price of gasoline would be higher. The development of alternative sources of fuel is being inhibited by artificially low gas prices. Developing renewable fuels such as hydrogen from water, diesel replacement from vegetable oil, ethanol and methane from biomass is expensive. As long as today's cheap gas is around, no one wants to put research money into technologies that won't pay off in fuel sales. Burning a nonrenewable fuel is the waste of precious resource. When we run out of oil, we are not just running out of gasoline. We will run out of the raw material to make thousands of products such as plastics, paints, medicines, and pesticides. The shock that drivers now experience is nothing compared to the shock the world will face without oil. Higher gasoline prices would not only ease that shock but actually benefit society. Sensible urban planning would reduce the need for cars and improve health through exercise. Imported and factory-farmed food would be too expensive, benefiting local farmers. Future generations will look back at our ignorance and say "our great grandparents had a precious gift from the earth and they burned it? What a shame."go back to my Columns in the